Clinical analysis of difficult small intestinal stoma closure operation

Xu Dongbo, Que Changrong

Journal of Abdominal Surgery ›› 2017, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 127-130.

PDF(534 KB)
PDF(534 KB)
Journal of Abdominal Surgery ›› 2017, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 127-130. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5591.2017.02.014
CONTENTS IN BRIEF

Clinical analysis of difficult small intestinal stoma closure operation

  • Xu Dongbo, Que Changrong
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of small intestinal stoma closure operation and reduce the complications. Methods The clinical data of 131 patients who received small intestinal stoma closure operation were reviewed retrospectively. According to the presence or absence of previous serious abdominal infection, abdominal chemotherapy, the history of more than three times of abdominal surgery and other risk factors, patients were divided into low risk (n=96) and high risk (n=35) groups. All the patients underwent preoperative imaging examinations, including chest and abdomen enhanced CT, ECG, colonoscopy, gastrointestinal imaging, echocardiography, etc. Patients all received routine laboratory tests, including tumor markers and other blood tests. Patients were given appropriate supportive therapy after admission. According to preoperative evaluation, the incisions were designed through the stoma or the middle of the abdomen. All patients underwent postoperative nutritional support, albumin supplement, wound dressing, peritoneal washing and other treatments. High-risk group and low-risk group received small intestinal stoma closure operation 6 months and within 2 to 6 months after the last operation respectively. Results In low-risk group, there were 51 males and 45 females with average age of 56.4±13.8 years. In high-risk group, there were 20 males and 15 females. The small intestinal stoma in the low-risk group was caused by preventive intestinal colostomy after elective surgery for colorectal tumor. In high-risk group, the reasons included preventive intestinal stoma in 20 patients, anastomosis fistula in 4 cases and intestinal perforation or traumatic enterorrhexis in 11 cases. In high-risk group, there were 2 cases who merged in preoperative abdominal radiotherapy, 9 cases in preoperative intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy, 6 patients with the history of more than 3 times previous abdominal surgery, and 18 cases with severe abdominal cavity infection. In low-risk group, 88 cases were qualified in 6 min walk test and 8 cases were unqualified. In high-risk group, 30 cases were qualified and 5 cases were unqualified. Preoperative serum albumin was greater than 30 g/L in all patients of low-risk group, and 29 cases in high-risk group. There were 6 cases less than 30 g/L in high-risk group. The hospital stay in low-risk group was 8.08±0.98 days, and 12.34±7.55 days in high-risk group. Complications of abdominal cavity infection, infection of incision, incision hernia, and intestinal fistula in high-risk groups were significantly more than those in low-risk group. The mortality was significantly higher in the high-risk group. Complications of positive patients in 6 min walk test significantly increased compared with those of negative patients. Conclusions Difficult small intestinal stoma closure operation is a high risk of surgery and it has the characteristics of long operation time, more bleeding, inevitable bowel injury or bowel resection. It has higher incidence of postoperative intestinal fistula, abdominal cavity infection, infection of incision, and incision hernia. The recovery is slow, and the expenses are high.

Key words

Small intestinal stoma / Closure operation / Complications

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xu Dongbo, Que Changrong. Clinical analysis of difficult small intestinal stoma closure operation[J]. Journal of Abdominal Surgery, 2017, 30(2): 127-130 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5591.2017.02.014

References

1 Johnson JW,Gracias VH,Schwab CW,et al.Evolution in damage control for exsanguinating penetmting abdominal injury.J Raumal,2001,51:261-271. DOI:org/10.1097/00005373-200108000-0000.
2 李宁.胃肠外科围手术期新理念的整合与应用.中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13:13-15.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2010.01.006.
3 兰平,练磊.肠造口及其相关问题.中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15:317-319. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2012.04.002.
4 Garcia-BoteUo SA,Garcia-Annengol J,Garcia-Granero E,et al.A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and take down.Dig Surg,2004,21:440-446.DOI:org/10.1159/000083471.
5 Pokomy H,Herknef H,Jakesz R,et al.Mortality and complications after stoma closure.Arch Surg,2005,140:956-960.DOI:org/10.1001/archsurg. 140.10.956.
6 丁俊涛,罗东林,童卫东,等.肠造口还纳手术72例临床分析.中华普通外科杂志,2010,25:1006-1007.
7 张军.肠造口还纳手术137例临床分析.临床医学,2014,34:29-30.
8 任建安,黎介寿.肠外瘘多次手术治疗的经验.中国实用外科杂志,2002,22:209-211.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1005-2208.2002.04.009.
9 曾珍秀.改良型灌肠器在远端造口肠道准备中的应用.全科护理,2014,12:1885-1886.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2014.20.034.
10 Pupim LB,Flakoll PJ,Ikizler TA,Exercise improves alburnin fractional synthetic rate in chronic hemodislysis patients.Eur J Clin Nutr,2007,61:686-689.DOI:org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602578.
11 任建安.肠瘘患者的手术时机选择.临床外科杂志,2007,15:662-663. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2007.10.006.
12 Gillis C,Li C,Lee L,et al.Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation:a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer.Anesthesiology,2014,121:937-947.DOI:org/10.1097/aln.0000000000000393.
13 李树民,徐鹏远,岑云云,等.腹部手术后早期血浆白蛋白及炎症介质变化的研究.中华普通外科杂志,2010,25:1002-1004.
14 王德坤,丁连安.腹部大手术前后营养风险筛查及其临床意义.肠外与肠内营养,2010,17:277-279.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-810X.2010. 05.007.
15 阙长榕,许东波,卢清平,等.结肠癌合并腹腔脓肿的临床分析.中华消化外科杂志,2015,14:461-465.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2015. 06.005.
16 黎介寿.营养支持治疗与加速康复外科.肠外与肠内营养,2015,22:65-67.
PDF(534 KB)

863

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/